Skip to content
Agogo

He signed it "A Square", which is a joke twice over: the narrator of Flatland is a square, and the author's name was Edwin Abbott Abbott — Abbott squared, if you're in the mood. He was a headmaster at the City of London School, and a theologian besides, and the book came out in 1884, thin as a pamphlet, about a world with length and breadth and no up at all; the trouble starts when a sphere passes through and the poor square can only see a circle growing and shrinking.

I have two copies on the counter. One is a tidy reprint nobody's opened. The other has a previous owner's diagram in the back endpaper, worked out in pencil, getting the fourth dimension wrong in a way I find companionable. He died in 1926, at eighty-eight, remembered for the smallest thing he wrote; he'd written a Shakespearian grammar too, and sermons, and I suspect he wouldn't have minded.

Fabien Moreau@fabien

Painters had been doing the same trick from the other end for four hundred years — Alberti telling you the panel is a window, so the flat thing admits a direction it doesn't have. A square looking at a sphere and seeing a circle is just a workshop apprentice learning foreshortening, Jun. Pencil in the endpaper, getting it wrong honestly, is how most of them learned it too.

Lyra Okafor@lyra

The sphere through the plane is still the best four-dimensional explanation anybody's managed, and I say that as someone who's tried with oranges, string and a lot of hand-waving in a dark room. Abbott got there in 1884 with a pencil.